Courts Searched — June 5, 2026

Daily Summary — June 5, 2026

Cases published today: 2

  • Hafeman v. Google LLC — Federal Circuit affirms PTAB ruling that “Find My Device” patents are unpatentable (IPR, obviousness, claim construction, § 314(d))
  • Melinta Therapeutics v. Nexus Pharmaceuticals — Federal Circuit affirms patent infringement in generic antibiotic case (Hatch-Waxman, claim construction, written description)

Cases confirmed already published: Hikma v. Amarin (SCOTUS, post 1571), Arendi v. Oath/Google (CAFC, post 1578), Ollnova v. ecobee (CAFC, post 1576), Life Spine v. Globus Medical (CAFC, post 1577), Scotts v. P&G (6th Cir., post 1579), Insulet v. EOFlow (CAFC, post 1513), Richardson v. Townsquare Media (2nd Cir., post 997).

Courts Searched

Court / Source Method IP Opinions Found
U.S. Supreme Court Pipeline + newsletter (CourtListener, SCOTUSBlog) 0 new today (FCC v. AT&T and Sripetch v. SEC are non-IP)
Federal Circuit Pipeline (CAFC RSS) + CourtListener alerts 2 patent opinions published; 3 non-IP dismissed (MSPB, international trade, veterans)
PTAB Pipeline ingestion 0 new decisions today
Circuit Courts (1st–11th, D.C.) Pipeline + GovInfo + web search 0 new IP opinions today
District Courts GovInfo aggregator + CourtListener 0 substantive new IP opinions (multiple procedural entries reviewed and skipped)
ITC Web search 0 new decisions (JOOLA/pickleball Inv. 337-TA-3898 opened but no decision yet)
State Courts — California Pipeline + web search 0 IP opinions
State Courts — New York Web search 0 IP opinions
State Courts — Texas Pipeline + web search 0 IP opinions
State Courts — Delaware Pipeline + web search 0 IP opinions
State Courts — Illinois Pipeline + web search 0 IP opinions
State Courts — Florida Web search 0 IP opinions
UK Patents Court / IPEC Web search 0 IP opinions
Federal Court of Canada Web search + Macek docket watcher 0 IP opinions (4 watched dockets still pending)
Federal Court of Australia Web search 0 IP opinions
EU Courts (CJEU) Web search 0 IP opinions
Unified Patent Court (UPC) Web search 0 IP opinions
EPO Boards of Appeal Web search 0 IP opinions
Germany (BGH / BPatG) Web search (German-language) 0 IP opinions
France (Cour de cassation / TJ Paris) Web search (French-language) 0 IP opinions
Japan (IP High Court / JPO) Web search (Japanese-language) 0 IP opinions
Korea (Supreme Court / Patent Court) Web search (Korean-language) 0 IP opinions
India (Delhi HC / Bombay HC) Web search 0 IP opinions
Other International Web search (Singapore, NZ, South Africa, China, Brazil, Mexico, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Switzerland, Sweden, Poland, Russia) 0 IP opinions

Additional Sources Checked

  • Commentary feeds: Eric Goldman’s Technology & Marketing Law Blog, Law360 IP — 30+ leads triaged; case-specific leads linked to existing posts or marked for future processing
  • Newsletter intake: CourtListener Federal Circuit/PTAB alerts, Patently-O, SCOTUSBlog, Justia daily digests, IPPractice.ca — 2,574 URL discoveries and 197 case mentions processed; all IP cases already covered
  • Macek docket watcher: 4 Canadian Federal Court cases monitored — all still pending (Janssen v. AG Canada, Canadian Linen v. Shah, Pacific Smoke v. GCore, Gavora v. Naughty Ventures)
  • Web searches: IPWatchdog, Patently-O, Bloomberg Law IP — no uncovered IP opinions found

State courts searched today: California, New York, Texas, Delaware, Illinois, Florida — no IP/AI opinions identified. Foreign courts searched: UK, Canada, Australia, India, New Zealand, Singapore, South Africa, EU/CJEU, UPC, EPO, Germany (BGH/BPatG), France (Cour de cassation, Tribunal judiciaire de Paris), Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Switzerland, Sweden, Poland, Japan (IP High Court / JPO), Korea (Supreme Court / Patent Court), China (SPC and specialized IP courts), Brazil, Mexico, Russia — no IP/AI opinions identified.

Scroll to Top