This page collects Federal Circuit Rule 36 summary affirmances, procedural orders, and other non-precedential dispositions in IP cases for June 2026. These cases do not have substantive opinions to summarize but are tracked for completeness.
| Date | Case | Docket | Disposition |
|---|---|---|---|
| June 3, 2026 | Amsted Rail Company, Inc. v. Squires | 24-2345 | Rule 36 Judgment (Affirmed) |
| June 3, 2026 | David Boland, Inc. v. Secretary of the Army | 25-1383 | Rule 36 Judgment (Non-IP: Gov’t Contracts) |
| June 1, 2026 | Zhang v. Parties Identified on Schedule A | 26-1539 | Order (Nonprecedential) |
| June 10, 2026 | Inneos LLC v. Opticis Co., Ltd. | 25-1487 | Rule 36 Judgment (Affirmed) |
| June 10, 2026 | In re Johnson | 26-137 | Order (Nonprecedential) |
| June 11, 2026 | In re Ecto World LLC (dba Demand Vape) v. RAI Strategic Holdings (ITC 337-TA-1486) | 26-132 | Order — Mandamus petition denied; Federal Circuit declines to order ITC to terminate or stay § 337 investigation into PACT Act violations |
| June 12, 2026 | Foras Technologies Ltd. v. BMW of North America, LLC | 25-1968 | Voluntary dismissal (FRCP 42(b)) — parties agreed to dismiss IPR2023-01373, IPR2024-00823 appeals; each side bears own costs |
| June 22, 2026 | Via Transportation, Inc. v. RideCo Inc. | 26-1101 / 26-1151 | Voluntary dismissal (FRCP 42(b)) — cross-appeals dismissed; each side bears own costs |
| June 22, 2026 | Clear Imaging Research LLC v. Google LLC | 26-1485 | Voluntary dismissal (FRCP 42(b)) — dismissed; each side bears own costs |
| June 22, 2026 | POM Group Inc. v. Schedule A Defendants (Sotiya et al.) | 26-1863 | Voluntary dismissal (FRCP 42(b)) — dismissed; each side bears own costs |
| June 23, 2026 | Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd. v. Hanwha Solutions Corp. | 26-1501 (IPR2024-01203) | Dismissed by agreement (FRAP 42(b)) |
| June 22, 2026 | Pom Group Inc. v. Schedule A Defendants (Sotiya, Conscious Items, Midnight Fancy, Tressevogue) | 26-1863 (W.D. Pa. 2:25-cv-01909) | Dismissed by agreement (FRAP 42(b)) — trademark/counterfeiting |
| June 22, 2026 | Clear Imaging Research LLC v. Google LLC | 26-1485 (S.D. Cal. 3:25-cv-00221) | Dismissed by agreement (FRAP 42(b)) — patent |
| June 24, 2026 | In re Seagate Technology Holdings plc et al. | 26-147 (E.D. Tex. 2:25-cv-00596-JRG) | Mandamus petition withdrawn by consent — Seagate had sought mandamus directing Judge Gilstrap (E.D. Tex.) in a patent case; parties agreed to withdraw and bear own costs |
| June 26, 2026 | CommScope Technologies LLC v. Belden Inc. | 25-1428 (IPR2023-01056) | Appeal voluntarily dismissed per Fed. R. App. P. 42(b)(1) — joint stipulation; each side bears own costs |
| June 26, 2026 | Power2B, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | 26-1654 (IPR2021-01257) | Appeal voluntarily dismissed per Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) — by agreement; each side bears own costs; mandate issued same day |
| June 30, 2026 | General Access Solutions, Ltd. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. | 26-1756 | Order (Nonprecedential) — patent case order |